Join AccuScore now using the code SALE50 for $50 off an annual All-Sports premium membership. For all others this is $349, but as you are reading this article, it is only $299... Join Today

a player who went undrafted (Arian Foster or Alfred Morris) or simply players who go in the middle rounds and vastly exceed their draft position. This year, there is a whole swath of running backs after round two who project similarly to one another but have warts that keep them from being thought of as premium assets. These warts range from playing for a bad team, to a lack of projected goalline work or lack of pass-catching ability. With touchdown upside and a weekly role as a pass-catcher, it is basically impossible to be an RB1 in fantasy. Last season, the lowest target total of a top 12 running back was Joe Mixon with 55. Barkley, CMC, Gurley, Kamara, Zeke, Melvin Gordon, and James Conner all saw more than 70 targets.

These three running backs are some of the hardest to project in all of fantasy football, as most running backs are in the mid-rounds. It is possible to project their playing time with reasonable certainty but the distribution of touches (rush vs pass vs goalline) is more difficult, as is the overall effectiveness of their offenses that they are in. The wide range of outcomes for Josh Jacobs, Aaron Jones, and Leonard Fournette has the ability to swing the course of the fantasy football season in all leagues.

Josh Jacobs

Of these three running backs, Jacobs is the one that I find myself drafting the most often. He is the cheapest of the three, with his ADP coming in at 38th overall as the 20th running back off the board. The history of running backs drafted in the first round suggests that he is due for volume almost immediately. Since 2010, only three running backs drafted in the first round did not reach 100 carries. The other 12 running backs produced six RB1 seasons and four RB2 seasons. There is no immediate competition for Jacobs on the roster as Doug Martin fails to inspire for the fourth season in a row and Jalen Richard is viewed as strictly a complementary back.

The issues for Jacobs reaching his upside is pretty clear. He was not a very good prospect, as he backed up third-round pick Damien Harris at Alabama. He ran an abysmal 4.69 40 yard dash time at the combine and is essentially a 10th percentile athlete. The history of players who were college backups and produced at an RB1 level in the NFL is pretty shallow. To take that further, it is even more difficult to be a member of a bad team and be an RB1. Touchdowns and yards are produced by winning teams, not by losing ones. Only Christian McCaffrey, David Johnson and Phillip Lindsay were top 12 running backs last season on teams that missed the playoffs.

However, you simply will not find that many running backs who have a realistic shot of handling > 60% of their teams carries and over 15% of the teams’ targets. Similar to David Johnson’s season last year, Jacobs is ultimately likely to have more than a few frustrating outings with 10 fantasy points or fewer but if he is used commiserate with his draft equity, Jacobs could pretty easily finish as a back-end RB1 in fantasy football.

Aaron Jones

Aaron Jones has maybe a wider range out of outcomes than Jacobs because Jones might be playing in an elite offense. Aaron Rodgers hasn’t shown that level efficacy in five seasons (Rodgers YPA last four years: 7.4, 7, 7.3, 6.7) but as someone who once stated Rodgers was the best QB to ever play the game, I am hesitant to put the nail in his coffin just yet. Jones projects to be the lead running back ahead of Jamaal Williams as he was from weeks five to 11 last year. In that time span, Jones had at least 75 yards or a touchdown in each game and topped three targets in all but one contest. That is an elite running back’s level of consistency in terms of usage.

Really, there are only a few concerns about Jones’ overall profile. He is really tied to Aaron Rodgers’ health. Last year, when Kizer was forced to spell Aaron Rodgers, he posted 2.3 adjusted yards per attempt (Not great). Rodgers is now entering his age-35 season after four straight seasons of decline. Green Bay also is undergoing a coaching change that onlookers at training camp have not been raving about. Our projections definitely love Jones more than the market because the average offense with Aaron Rodgers should be above league average. There also are not many running backs who project for more work than Jones but concerns about his role in the passing game remain. Green Bay should have at least three players ahead of Jones in market share of pass attempts (Adams, MVS, Geronimo Allison) but he may also lose some snaps to Jamaal Williams and rookie Dexter Williams on third downs. Speculation from those that follow the team close is that the team may not be throwing the running backs much at all in 2019.

Jones certainly needs more things to break in an unseen or favorable way than the top five running backs (whose only job is to show up and not get injured) but Jones’ 80th percentile outcome season is really pretty magical. Rodgers and Green Bay haven’t seen a stud running back since 2014 Eddie Lacy who had 13 touchdowns, 55 targets in the passing game and 1,566 scrimmage yards. That could never be a median projection for someone in Jones’ position but if he achieved that stat line (with better efficiency because, well, he isn’t Eddie Lacy) at his current ADP, he would feature on a number of league-winning teams.

Leonard Fournette

This pains me to write as Fournette is really not the sort of player I ever try to own. His upside is entirely volume-related which is true for all fantasy players but even more extreme in Fournette’s case. In his lone RB1 season, Fournette averaged 3.9 yards per carry despite recording a 90-yard touchdown run. He also saw 48 targets in 13 games that season while averaging 6.5 yards per target (quite good for a running back). That season, however, the Jacksonville Jaguars were good. They made the playoffs and finished 5th in points scored in the NFL. That is the sort of team whose top running back you would expect would finish inside the top-12 in fantasy football scoring.

Fast forward a year and Fournette was only able to play in eight games. He spent the offseason annoying his coaches and the Jaguars organization while they drafted Ryquell Armstead and signed veteran Alfred Blue. The team appears pleased with the way that Fournette has performed in training camp but more importantly, the coaches seem to want to use him in the passing game. Coach Doug Marrone recently stated “He’s someone that we can use in the pass game, and he has the skill. I’ve said it from the beginning. People have asked me, ‘What’s the one thing about Leonard?’ This is two years ago that that stood out, and it was his pass-catching ability.”

If Marrone does actually mean that, Fournette is probably likely to outperform his fourth-round ADP. In fact, if Fournette is locked into passing down work for Jacksonville, I would be sort of shocked if he wasn’t one of the most valuable running backs in fantasy. Even when he was hurt and playing poorly, the team used him as their primary rusher while he was losing passing-down snaps to T.J Yeldon. I have done enough drafts (particularly in the DRAFT Best Ball Championship) that I have started to take Fournette in the mid-fourth but I still don’t feel good about taking a career 3.7 yards per carry back and expecting him to produce weekly RB2 numbers. If the pass-catching role shows itself in the preseason, however, he will be moving up my rankings.

Three Fantasy Football Running Backs To Win Your League

Today’s Free Sports Predictions

Date Team Acc Sim% Odds% PS OU
Acc OU
ML SV Total
2025-06-30 18:30:00 30/06
18:30 AM
SD
PHI
32.6
67.4
31.6
68.4
PHI 0 N/A
8

Locked Content!
Please login for additional information

What is Accuscore?


Accuscore provides predictive analytics on sports, based on the company’s own algorithmic simulation engine which has been under constant development for almost two decades. Sports predictions are an outcome of simulations in which individual games are simulated for thousands of times in order to arrive to the most likely results. These results are then used to create analytical predictions, content and advice for bettors, pundits or any stakeholders in the industry or media field. For the individual US users, Accuscore’s predictions can be accessed through subscription to BetQL.

The Accuscore simulation engine uses the relevant historical data of the players, teams and leagues to predict the outcomes of the games before they have started. The simulation results are based on the individual player performances and weighted according to the teams’ form, opponent and other circumstances that have been proven relevant to the outcome of the match. We have managed to filter out the unnecessary data-points by determining which are important and which are not – this has taken several hundreds of thousands of simulations, cross-references and comparisons of simulation results to actual outcomes.

Accuscore aims to provide independent, unbiased and objective sports predictions for all the customers. We strive to be transparent and all our simulations results are available in the archives. Throughout the years Accuscore has worked with several betting companies, for example Pinnacle and Coolbet, media houses such as Telia and Sporing News, sports teams and leagues, and of course individuals through our subscription service.

Our capabilities include tailoring the sports predictions service to any B2B need with different licensing models, revenue sharing programs or affiliate markets. We can package content based on the simulations in several different ways, which can include automated widgets, unique articles, videos or pure numbers from a feed – whatever suits your needs!

Which sports does Accuscore cover?

Currently Accuscore provides detailed sports predictions for most of the popular sports and leagues in the World. The current offering includes:
  • American Football: NFL and College Football
  • Basketball: NBA and College Basketball
  • Baseball: MLB baseball
  • Ice Hockey: NHL, Finnish Liiga, Swedish SHL and World Championships
  • Football (soccer) leagues:
    • Champions League
    • English Premier League
    • Spanish La Liga
    • Italian Serie A
    • German Bundesliga
    • French Ligue 1
    • Scottish Premier League
    • Portuguese Liga
    • Netherlands Eredivisie
    • Mexican Liga MX
    • North-American MLS
    • Chinese Super League
    • English Championship, League One and League Two
    • Major international tournaments: World Cup, Euro, Copa America

Accuscore’s newly implemented model for eSports is currently in its testing phase and the CSGO (Counter Strike: Global Offensive) sports predictions can be found from our sister site.

We also have capability to add leagues on request and provide unique, tailor-made service.

How to use Accuscore sports predictions?

Accuscore’s simulations provide various advantages for both businesses and individuals. The simulations are based on a sovereign algorithmic system and all the simulations are always ran the exact same way. The only variables are the data inputs which the simulation engine then uses to create the sports predictions according to the algorithmic model. The model has a proven track record and for example the NFL picks have provided constant profit over the years.

The simulations provide probabilities for the outcomes of the games which include – depending of the sport – for example the most likely final result, the amount of goals or points and player performances. These sport predictions can be compared to odds in order to make a more educated betting decision or they can be used to support, oppose or adjust ones view on the betting market.

For businesses the sports predictions provide an opportunity to use original content in various forms which can be modified to suit any need, for example: providing more information to customers, attracting traffic or users, as unique content to publish or for other marketing purposes such as short videos for social media. We are happy to tailor our service for each B2B customer.

How to join Accuscore and secure the best sports predictions?

The best way to start using the Accuscore sports predictions is to subscribe to our service which includes a free seven-day trial period. Subscription allows access to all the sports predictions, historical archives and articles. If you are not happy with the service, you can cancel the subscription within the seven-day period with no cost.

We are also providing a daily free preview on the Accuscore site, so be sure to check back regularly to catch the prediction for the oncoming game. Occasionally we are also providing picks from our experts, based on the simulations. The picks can be found from our free expert picks page.

For any B2B needs, feel free to contact us through customer service or look us up at LinkedIn or Facebook!

This is how well our simulations work!

Testimonials

Accuscore Features

icon

Premium data, proven simulation engine

icon

Fixtures simulated 10,000 times

icon

All major US Sports and fantasy predicted

icon

Free daily picks

icon

Member only picks and tips