|
Tuesday, 13 October 2009 16:47 |
|
AFC
There were major playoff
probability shifts in the AFC this week, none more significant than
the Bengals leap in the rankings and Baltimore’s large decline.
If Baltimore had beaten the Bengals at home their probability would
not have increased much, but by losing a game at home to a division
rival their chances dropped from first to third in the division.
The Bengals benefited massively improving their playoff chances to nearly
69 percent. The Bengals have won 3 games they were heavy underdogs
in and the rest of their schedule has a number of teams they are ‘supposed’
to beat. It will be interesting to see how the Bengals stand up
to the pressure of being favored. Pittsburgh saw their chances
increase because 1) they beat Detroit and Baltimore lost but 2) their
running game has gone from one of the worst to potentially one of the
best with the emergence of Rashard Mendenhall.
The Broncos impressively
racked up another win and their playoff probability is up to 76 percent.
The pressure is squarely on the Chargers to win on Monday Night.
If the Broncos win and their defense once again holds a potent offense
to under 21 points they will not only have a substantial lead in the
division, but they will also have the statistical proof that their defense
is indeed #1 in the league right now.
The Colts already have
a strangle hold on the AFC South. Every other team lost this week
and the Colts amazingly have a 99.6 percent chance of winning the AFC
South. In the pre-season this was the most competitive division
in the AFC West. Right now the only real chance the Colts have
of slipping is a Peyton Manning injury. Their high chances are
not just due to being undefeated, it has just as much to do with the
fact that their passing offense is so good and the Achilles heel of
many upcoming opponents is pass defense.
The Miami Dolphins
were actually impressive for an 0-3 team and after 2 big division wins
where they scored over 30 points they are now moving rapidly up the
AFC East rankings. By beating the Jets they actually have a slightly
higher probability of winning the division despite being 1 game behind
New York. The Patriots are still leading the AFC East in winning
the division despite losing to Denver and seeing their playoff probability
plummet over 20 percent.
| AFC |
WEEK
5 REVIEW |
PLAYOFF |
%
CHANCE |
|
TEAM |
WK
5 |
WK
6 |
%
DIFF |
WIN
DIV |
| CINCINNATI
BENGALS |
26.4% |
68.7% |
42.3% |
34.3% |
| MIAMI
DOLPHINS |
11.1% |
45.1% |
34.0% |
31.8% |
| DENVER
BRONCOS |
65.6% |
76.4% |
10.7% |
60.6% |
| PITTSBURGH
STEELERS |
63.8% |
74.0% |
10.2% |
38.5% |
| INDIANAPOLIS
COLTS |
98.8% |
99.9% |
1.1% |
99.6% |
| CLEVELAND
BROWNS |
0.1% |
0.1% |
0.0% |
0.0% |
| TENNESSEE
TITANS |
1.1% |
0.7% |
-0.4% |
0.0% |
| KANSAS
CITY CHIEFS |
0.8% |
0.1% |
-0.7% |
0.1% |
| OAKLAND
RAIDERS |
1.0% |
0.2% |
-0.8% |
0.1% |
| BUFFALO
BILLS |
5.4% |
0.6% |
-4.8% |
0.3% |
| HOUSTON
TEXANS |
11.4% |
5.7% |
-5.7% |
0.2% |
| SAN
DIEGO CHARGERS |
67.0% |
58.6% |
-8.3% |
39.2% |
| NEW
YORK JETS |
55.8% |
44.0% |
-11.8% |
28.9% |
| JACKSONVILLE
JAGUARS |
28.5% |
12.7% |
-15.8% |
0.2% |
| NEW
ENGLAND PATRIOTS |
75.5% |
53.1% |
-22.4% |
39.0% |
| BALTIMORE
RAVENS |
87.7% |
60.2% |
-27.6% |
27.2% |
NFC
The Falcons offense
exploded and their defense was impressive in their win over San Francisco.
While New Orleans is still in control of the NFC South, Atlanta is now
a solid 4th in the NFC in overall playoff probability.
Last year’s NFC South champ, Carolina, beat Washington by 3 points
but actually saw their already slim playoff probability decline slightly
as there is little statistical proof that this team can return to being
an elite team, despite their win.
The disappointing 49ers
saw the biggest drop in playoff probability --- a whopping 45.5 percentage
points. The combination of a home loss, Arizona’s win, and Seattle’s
impressive win all took their toll on San Francisco. San Francisco
would not have dropped as significantly if this were a close game, but
when you allow 45 points and struggle against both the pass and run
it has a negative impact on their forecasted performance the rest of
the season. Seemingly overnight, the NFC West is once again a
highly competitive 3 team race.
There were not many
major shifts in the NFC East as all 3 contenders (the Giants, Cowboys,
and Eagles) won games they were expected to win an all 3 teams saw their
playoff probabilities improve slightly. Washington has had a very
easy schedule with just 1 quality opponent but still only have a 2-3
record. Washington is favored next week vs Kansas City, but after
that are only favored in 1 game the rest of the season.
The NFC North was relatively
quiet this season with Chicago and Green Bay both on Bye weeks and Detroit
losing to Pittsburgh, as expected.
| NFC |
WEEK
5 REVIEW |
PLAYOFF |
%
CHANCE |
|
TEAM |
WK
5 |
WK
6 |
%
DIFF |
WIN
DIV |
| ATLANTA
FALCONS |
39.6% |
66.2% |
26.6% |
30.0% |
| SEATTLE
SEAHAWKS |
4.5% |
28.1% |
23.5% |
27.1% |
| ARIZONA
CARDINALS |
27.1% |
44.4% |
17.3% |
43.2% |
| DALLAS
COWBOYS |
26.5% |
31.1% |
4.6% |
8.4% |
| PHILADELPHIA
EAGLES |
57.8% |
62.2% |
4.4% |
34.6% |
| NEW
YORK GIANTS |
81.8% |
83.3% |
1.5% |
56.9% |
| ST.
LOUIS RAMS |
0.0% |
0.1% |
0.1% |
0.1% |
| DETROIT
LIONS |
0.0% |
0.0% |
0.0% |
0.0% |
| TAMPA
BAY BUCCANEERS |
0.0% |
0.0% |
0.0% |
0.0% |
| MINNESOTA
VIKINGS |
93.1% |
91.5% |
-1.6% |
80.0% |
| CAROLINA
PANTHERS |
2.1% |
0.4% |
-1.6% |
0.2% |
| WASHINGTON
REDSKINS |
4.3% |
0.6% |
-3.6% |
0.1% |
| NEW
ORLEANS SAINTS |
94.6% |
90.3% |
-4.3% |
69.9% |
| GREEN
BAY PACKERS |
44.7% |
36.5% |
-8.1% |
8.9% |
| CHICAGO
BEARS |
48.0% |
34.7% |
-13.3% |
11.1% |
| SAN
FRANCISCO 49ERS |
76.1% |
30.6% |
-45.5% |
29.7% |
|
|
Monday, 12 October 2009 18:18 |
|
If things go as expected
Florida and Alabama should meet in the SEC Championship Game and many
will consider this the “real” National Championship. Last
season the Gators won 31-20 coming from behind with the last 14 points
of the game. AccuScore ran simulations of the 2009 SEC Championship
Game based on the data we have so far after Week 6.
FLORIDA BY THE SLIMMEST
MARGIN
In 10,000 simulations
the two teams are virtually inseparable, although Florida is getting
the slight edge over Alabama winning 51 percent of the simulations by
an average of just 0.3 points. Florida is averaging more passing
yards than Alabama, but Alabama is having more success running the ball.
Florida has a 0.01 edge in total offensive touchdowns 2.41 to 2.40.
In games this close turnover margin is typically the deciding factor
and this is where Florida is getting its edge. The Florida defense
is recovering 1.82 Alabama turnovers vs 1.47 for Alabama’s defense.
| ALABAMA
vs FLORIDA |
ALA |
FLA |
| Winning
Percentage |
49% |
51% |
| Average
Sim Score |
20.1 |
20.4 |
| Passing
Yards |
142 |
172 |
| Passing
Touchdowns |
0.74 |
1.39 |
| Rushing
Yards |
158 |
110 |
| Rushing
Touchdowns |
1.66 |
1.02 |
| Turnovers
(More Better) |
1.47 |
1.82 |
ALABAMA CAN RUN
ON FLORIDA
Both teams dominate
teams running the ball while also have dominating run defenses.
In simulations Alabama, behind a strong effort from Mark Ingram, has
more success running the ball. Alabama is rushing for 3.67 yards
per carry and over 150 yards vs just 110 yards on 2.82 yards per carry
for Florida. Alabama’s defense is expected to stop Florida from
getting many explosive runs while also limiting Tim Tebow to just short
bruising 2 yard pickups.
| FLORIDA |
RUSH |
YARDS |
YPC |
TD |
|
ALABAMA |
RUSH |
YARDS |
YPC |
TD |
| Tim Tebow |
18 |
33 |
1.83 |
0.35 |
|
Mark Ingram |
23 |
90 |
3.91 |
0.93 |
| Jeffery
Demps |
8 |
30 |
3.75 |
0.29 |
|
Trent Richardson |
13 |
48 |
3.69 |
0.50 |
| Chris Rainey |
7 |
27 |
3.86 |
0.22 |
|
Roy Upchurch |
3 |
12 |
4.00 |
0.15 |
| Emmanuel
Moody |
6 |
20 |
3.33 |
0.16 |
|
Greg McElroy |
4 |
8 |
2.00 |
0.08 |
| FLORIDA
TOTAL |
39 |
110 |
2.82 |
1.02 |
|
ALABAMA TOTAL |
43 |
158 |
3.67 |
1.66 |
TIM TEBOW OUTPLAYS
GREG MCELROY
Tebow may not be able
to run over the Alabama defense, but he showed last year that it can
be nearly impossible to stop Tebow from hurting you in both the running
and passing game. Last year Tebow passed for 3 TDs and 0 interceptions.
In 2009 simulations Tebow is completing a higher percentage than Alabama’s
Greg McElroy while also having a better than 2 to 1 TD to INT ratio.
McElroy is averaging 1 interception which is actually pretty good against
the Florida defense, but McElroy’s +0.37 more INTs than Tebow is the
source of Florida’s turnover margin advantage and ultimate overall
51% edge.
If McElroy throws no
interceptions and can complete over 50 percent of his passes then Alabama
is favored, but if he makes any mistakes or completes under 50 percent
then Florida should repeat as SEC Champions.
| PASSING |
CMP |
ATT |
% |
YARDS |
TD |
INT |
| Tim Tebow |
13 |
23 |
56.5% |
172 |
1.39 |
0.63 |
| Greg McElroy |
14 |
26 |
53.8% |
142 |
0.74 |
1.00 |
|
|
Wednesday, 07 October 2009 16:55 |
|
Braylon Edwards was
spectacular in 2007 with 80 receptions, nearly 1300 yards, 16 TDs and
16.1 yards per reception. Poor QB play and his own problem dropping
catchable balls has resulted in a huge drop-off since ’07.
Time will tell if Braylon
Edwards emerges as the #1 over Jerricho Cotchery in New York, but if
he can establish himself as a solid #2, his production per target (fewer
drops, more yards per reception, more TDs) should increase substantially
playing with a better offense that can run the ball well and a QB who
actually completes over 57 percent of his passes.
Before the trade AccuScore
gave the Jets a 56 percent chance of making the playoffs and a 34 percent
chance of winning the AFC East. With a motivated, more “stable”
Edwards the Jets improved their chances of winning the division to 38
percent and chances of making the playoffs to 61 percent.
|
|
Written by Jonathan Lee
|
|
Tuesday, 06 October 2009 22:26 |
|
I’ve seen many people discounting the
Dodgers and already penciling in the Cardinals into the World Series.
Doing so does a complete disservice to the rest of the National League.
The Dodgers have homefield as a result of the league’s best record,
and the best run differential (+169 or 79 more than St. Louis).
The love for the Cardinals stems from their two Cy Young caliber starters
in Adam Wainwright and Chris Carpenter, and the best hitter in the game
Albert Pujols.
| CARDINALS
vs DODGERS |
WIN SERIES |
GAME1 |
GAME2 |
GAME3 |
GAME4 |
GAME5 |
| St. Louis
Cardinals |
56% |
53% |
55% |
55% |
49% |
53% |
| Los Angeles
Dodgers |
44% |
47% |
45% |
45% |
51% |
47% |
The simulations are based on the following
pitching match-ups:
Game 1: Carpenter vs. Wolf
Game 2: Wainwright vs. Kershaw
Game 3: Piniero vs. Padilla
Game 4: Lohse vs. Billingsley
Game 5: Carpenter vs. Wolf
The projections for this series actually
back-up the general belief that the Cardinals are the big favorites,
but there are a few extenuating circumstances. L.A. was dealt
a huge blow when it was learned that Hiroki Kuroda would not be available
(possibly for the entire playoffs) to pitch Game 3. His presence
compared to Padilla in St. Louis actually would have swung Game 3 11%
with the Dodgers winning 56% of the time. Needless to say his
injury is a massive loss.
The thing that stands out the most in
these projections is the advantage provided by both Carpenter and Wainwright
on the road (1, 2, and 5). Carpenter gives the Cardinals a 6%
edge in both Games 1 and 5 against Wolf. Wainwright provides a
big edge against Kershaw in Game 2, but Kershaw does have the talent
to match zeros with him on the scoreboard. I see that second outing
as the pivotal game. Chad Billingsley has had his share of problems
late in the season, but he should provide the Dodgers an edge over either
Lohse or Smoltz for the Cardinals. The use of Vicente Padilla
in the third contest is questionable, and magnifies the loss of Kuroda
even further.
Another issue to pay attention to is
the management, or mis-management, of the bullpen and lineups.
It has already been announced that Ronnie Belliard will start at 2B
for the Dodgers in Game 1. While Belliard has been hot at the
plate over the past few weeks, his underlying stats indicate he is an
inferior hitter as well as fielder to Orlando Hudson. Joe Torre
is not maximizing his talent by playing Belliard.
The Cardinals will have to deal with
questions in the rotation and bullpen. Either Kyle Lohse or John
Smoltz will likely start Game 4. Both players will be available
out of the bullpen in Los Angeles. Their presence as relievers
could be very beneficial as closer Ryan Franklin has struggled after
being the beneficiary of lots of good luck in the first half.
The other middle relievers are unproven and a veteran like Smoltz could
be key.
|
|
Written by Jonathan Lee
|
|
Tuesday, 06 October 2009 18:51 |
|
This series between the AL West winning
Angels and the Wild Card Red Sox provides an interesting match-up because
of the recent history between both teams.
| RED
SOX vs ANGELS |
WIN SERIES |
GAME1 |
GAME2 |
GAME3 |
GAME4 |
GAME5 |
| Boston
Red Sox |
49% |
49% |
48% |
50% |
53% |
49% |
| Los Angeles
Angels |
51% |
51% |
52% |
50% |
47% |
51% |
This series projection is based on the
following pitching assumptions:
Game 1: Lackey vs. Lester
Game 2: Weaver vs. Beckett
Game 3: Kazmir vs. Bucholz
Game 4: Saunders vs. Matsuzaka
Game 5: Lackey vs. Lester
The schedule would allow Both Game 1
starters to pitch in a potential Game 4 on three days’ rest and
the Game 2 starters to pitch Game 5 on normal rest. This simulation
does not include that scenario.
With Games 1, 2, and 5 at home in Anaheim
the Angels are slight favorites in what are fairly even pitching match-ups.
Game 3 is a virtual coin flip with Scott Kazmir having a strong history
against the Red Sox, and Bucholz’s poor first half work factored in.
If Bucholz performs closer to his talent level as he has in the second
half of the season then that game could tip in favor of the Red Sox.
The biggest simulation difference is Game 4 with Dice-K against Saunders
with Boston having a 6% edge.
Overall the Angels are slight favorites
winning the series 51% of the time. This is a result of a combination
of homefield advantage, better overall performance this season, and
better recent performance. The Angels finished the year on a 7-1
spurt and 11-6 over their last 17 games while the Red Sox were swept
by both the Yankees and Blue Jays the last week of September.
If the Angels are able to maintain their
projected edge and win this series it would run counter to the recent
past playoff history. Boston swept Los Angeles of Anaheim in both
2004 and 2007 in the Division Series while winning 3-1 a year ago leading
most to assume the Sox will win again. Psychological edge or not,
this is likely the deepest rotation the Angels have had this decade,
and the lineup is certainly more balanced around Vladimir Guerrero than
it was a season ago.
|
|
Written by Jonathan Lee
|
|
Tuesday, 06 October 2009 18:49 |
|
Many fans might be thinking this is a
repeat of 2007 when the Rockies got a bit lucky and made a shocking
run to the World Series. This season is not a fluke as Colorado
rode an improved rotation, a typically strong lineup, and the NL’s
best home record to a playoff spot. The Phillies’ core
of Hamels, Utley, Rollins, and Howard were buttressed this year by the
additions of Cliff Lee and Raul Ibañez.
| ROCKIES
vs PHILLIES |
WIN SERIES |
GAME1 |
GAME2 |
GAME3 |
GAME4 |
GAME5 |
| Colorado
Rockies |
40% |
41% |
40% |
49% |
50% |
40% |
| Philadelphia
Philllies |
60% |
59% |
60% |
51% |
50% |
60% |
This simulation is based on the following
pitching assumptions:
Game 1: Jimenez vs. Lee
Game 2: Cook vs. Hamels
Game 3: Marquis vs. Blanton
Game 4: De la Rosa vs. Martinez
Game 5: Jimenez vs. Lee
This series is more difficult to project
because of the uncertainty with both pitching rotations. The Phillies
are set with Lee, Hamels, and Blanton but the Game 4 starter could either
be Pedro Martinez or rookie J.A. Happ. Happ probably deserves
the start on performance, but he would be better able to adjust to a
bullpen role having done so previously, and the Phillies lack a power
left-handed reliever due to the absence of J.C. Romero.
Colorado has several pitching issues
of its own, first of all the health of Jorge de la Rosa. He suffered
a groin strain against the Dodgers last week, and it has yet to be determined
if he will be healthy enough to pitch. If de la Rosa is fine,
either Jason Marquis or Jason Hammel would pitch one of the middle games.
Both have bullpen experience, but Marquis had a slightly better season
so we are projecting him to start.
Hamels and Lee, when they are on, are
among the best pitchers in the National League. Having both pitch
at home gives the Phillies at least double digit simulation advantages
in Games 1 and 2 as well as a potential Game 5. Both are quite
capable of being the number 1 starter, but in this series that honor
has fallen upon Lee. Going with this alignment and pitching Lee
twice actually improves Philadelphia’s chances by 2% overall.
Despite Lee’s recent struggles, he has been better overall than Hamels.
Homefield for Colorado in Games 3 and 4 is helping to even their projected
chances in those games. A fully healthy De la Rosa would be a
huge factor on if the Rockies are favored in one of those two games.
Both lineups feature great power which
could lead to some big run totals in these two ballparks. Four
different Phillies have hit 30+ home runs while 3 others have at least
10. Eight different Rockies have at least 13 home runs led by
Troy Tulowitzki with 32. A big factor in this series could be
the bullpens. Philadelphia has struggled mightily trying to find
a closer because of Brad Lidge’s struggles. Moving Ryan Madson
to the 9th inning role would create another void in the set-up
role. Colorado should be set at the end of games, but Huston Street
has dealt with some recent injuries and Franklin Morales is relatively
new to a late-inning reliever role.
Both teams have issues mostly related
to pitching. Still, Philadelphia has two true ace caliber starters,
and could possibly have them pitch in 4 of the 5 games in the series.
That would be a tall task for Colorado to overcome.
|
|