Skip to content
Giants Formula for an Upset Print E-mail
Stephen Oh - AccuScore Analyst
read blog

Does anyone else wonder why “experts” get paid to be on TV to come up with pearls of wisdom like:

“If the Giants pass rush can pressure Brady and force a couple turnovers and if Eli Manning continues to play mistake-free football, then the Giants have a real shot.”

One of the primary reasons for why AccuScore was even started was to be able to quantify just how much better the pass rush has to be, or how mistake-free does Eli have to be in order to make the Giants a statistical favorite (win > 50% of simulations). 

Everyone knows that for the Giants to win a lot of factors have to go in their favor.  The point of this analysis is to focus on which key statistical factors are most crucial to the Giants’ success and how much better than expected do they have to be in these areas to upset the Patriots?

These are the key factors:

  1. Eli Manning’s Completion Percentage – forecasted for 55.7% he needs to be at 62.0% (6.3 percentage points means 11% better than expected).
  2. Giants RB Long Run % - when a RB gets past the front 7 they typically run for 8 or more yards.  In baseline simulations, Jacobs and Bradshaw do this in 18% of carries.  They need to be at 21% (more than 1 in 5) which is a 17% improvement in this part of the game.
  3. Giants Run 55% of the Time – if the Giants are behind big late in the game they will have to pass, but when the game is close they run 49% of the time in simulations.  They should increase this to 55% of the time. 
  4. Giants Pass Rush Needs to Sack Brady 4+ Times – the Giants are forecasted to sack Tom Brady twice.  They need to double their baseline sack rate.

The bad news for Giants fans is this is a lot of things that need to go your way.  Factor #2 and #3 are tough to deal in combination because if the Giants do call for more rush attempts and the Patriots defensive scheme expects this then it will be hard for Brandon Jacobs and Ahmad Bradshaw to increase the number of long runs they get.  It is also tough to sack Tom Brady twice as much as expected.  If the Giants blitz like crazy they put tremendous pressure on the secondary to cover Moss, Welker, Watson, Stallworth, Gaffney, Faulk, etc. one-on-one. 

You can see why the Giants are heavy underdogs despite arguably playing more impressive football than the Patriots in the playoffs.

The good news for Giants fans is none of these 4 factors is beyond reason.  Obviously, the team can control which plays to call so #3 is a no brainer.  Eli Manning has completed over 62% of his passes in the playoffs in some tough conditions.  Jacobs and Bradshaw are running well. Jacobs is a monster who has averaged over 4.5 ypc for his career and Bradshaw is at 5.7 in his 62 career carries (regular season and playoffs).  The Giants led the league in sacks and averaged over 3 per game.

If the Giants can succeed in these 4 parts of the game they win a shade over 45% of simulations even with the Patriots playing at their normal, high level. 

I know what you are saying --- 45% isn’t a statistical favorite.  The one additional factor that comes into play is where Tom Brady gets sacked and if the Giants can strip the ball from him and recover fumbles.  In these simulations Brady has a 55% chance of losing a fumble.  If the Giants not only sack Brady 4 times, but they also force a fumble and recover (preferably in scoring position), then they pull off the upset.

Trackback(0)
Comments (5)add comment

NYG said:

 
Paintdis, last game was 35-38 and were playing better football now..... and we have the best defensive line in the league... and brady is scared when people come near... and our secondary is playing better.... and we've played a better secondary than NE and still raped them.... AL harris couldnt stop Plaxi and hes better than any Pats CB
February 01, 2008

NYC said:

 
Omar, Brady won 3 super bowls. Enough said.
February 01, 2008

paintdis said:

 
no one on the giants can cover pats recievers .... 45 - 17 ... good run though giants...
February 01, 2008

pal said:

 
smilies/grin.gifTom is my hero
January 29, 2008

Omar Alcala R said:

 
Hi.

I have to stat that I don't see Brady as a top-notch QB as others through time, since his accuracy in long distance passes is questionable -even by himself-, and he looks really scared when pressured (I've seen him lying down if he "feels" a sack coming smilies/grin.gif). What I see in Brady is his quick accurate release of the ball, and his time control has no match. Since his Offensive Line protects him extremely well, those 2-3 extra secs makes Brady a killer in medium distance, and I think that has been a key factor for NE in the past 7 seasons. I'd like to see how much affects Brady an average team's OL, maybe not the 2007 KC or SF units, maybe something like Detroit's or Texans OL. Thanks
January 28, 2008

Write comment
quote
bold
italicize
underline
strike
url
image
quote
quote
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley

busy
 
< Prev   Next >