| AccuScore NBA System |
|
|
|
Watching the NBA is like watching a movie. When Michael Jordan was in the game, it was like watching a movie where Robert De Niro is the lead. De Niro has been a part of some big movies, but he also can draw you in for smaller movies, such as Hide and Seek. Jordan on the Bulls is like De Niro in The Godfather, yet his time with the Wizards equates to De Niro in Hide and Seek. While the Wizards and Hide and Seek don’t appeal to the average fan, add Jordan and De Niro and now you have an audience. When it comes to the NBA, I am a part of that audience. I watched the NBA with a casual interest when they had the Dream Team in 1992, and when Jordan, Rodman, and Pippen were with the Bulls. Then the NBA turned to the Allen Iverson type players who put up 40-50 points a night, and were praised as stars, even though they never helped their team win. That didn’t really keep my interest. Recently the NBA has put out a few stars like Steve Nash, Dwayne Wade, and LeBron James, who are actually likeable stars. These guys have brought my interest back, to the point where I actually have a fantasy basketball team, taking LeBron with the 5th pick, and Wade in the second round. To create some more interest in the game I have also been tracking some wagering strategies. In the process I have found an excellent system with Accuscore data that has won 65% of the time thus far. During the MLB season I had a lot of success betting Accuscore picks that had side value. I decided to start tracking the NBA teams who had side value on the moneyline, with the theory that these picks would be stronger with the points I was given for underdogs. I barely have enough time to post my football picks to my blog each week, so there is no way I would be able to post daily NBA picks. Therefore, allow me to share this system with you all. STEP ONE: CALCULATING THE SIDE VALUE The following formula can be used to calculate the side value of the moneyline. “Side value” basically means that Accuscore is giving a certain team a bigger winning percentage than Vegas is. The following shows how we find the Vegas percentages:
If the Accuscore simulation win percentage is greater than the Vegas win percentage given in step two, then the team has side value. In this particular game, Cleveland is winning Accuscore simulations 38.1% of the time, giving them the side value pick. STEP TWO: WEEDING OUT THE BAD PICKS The next step is to take the teams that have side value with the points they are given, thus improving the odds of that team even more. I have noticed that on any given night, the majority of underdogs can have an Accuscore side value. Not all of these teams are covering the spread in Accuscore simulations. In the above situation, Cleveland is covering their +7 spread 54.3% of the time. If you take the picks that have an Accuscore side value, and are covering the spread in Accuscore simulations, you will get the best results. The picks that I have tracked so far this season that meet these two criteria have covered 65.5% of the time, for a total of 7.29 units won. The picks that weren’t covering the Accuscore spread were only winning 43.8% of the time. I have been tracking this method for 10 days, and have won eight out of ten days, going 0-1 on one day, and 1-1 on another day. As usual, money management is the key to the success of this method. There are no gambling methods that win every night. All it would take is doubling your units wagered on an unfortunate 0-3 night to wipe out 10 days of success. The good part about this system is that it takes five minutes to calculate the picks, and it generates 3-4 picks a night on average. The best part is that you can win betting the NBA, even if you have very little knowledge of the sport. Trackback(0)
Comments (13)
![]()
grwildcat
said:
|
|||||||||||||||||
| I have followed this system over the last 3 weeks and in the beginning I was up 8 units I am now currently down 10 units overall. That 18 unit turn around is ridiculous in such a short amount of time. Also be wary that you can not verify this system because previous DLR's are not available unless you saved each one daily to your computer. I'm not calling the author a lier but I should have trusted my gut when it said not to follow a system I couldn't verify myself. Plain and simple this system is no where near accurate as the MLB sidevalue system(which I will still use in the upcoming season)and it may be better value to fade instead of tail |
| can we possibly get an update on how ur doin with this system? I've been doin it since the 12th, i'm 9-9 so far. I also have the same question as mathprof, sometimes the cushion on the ML is incredibly good according to Accuscore simulations, it would be nice to see how successful betting on the ML is |
| Kalmikrazy, Those were the right plays for last night. 2-3 on the night. I haven't done this system for every night, and there may have been plays on the closing line that have developed after I calculated the odds (I find this happens on occasion for the 10:00 games. No side value at 6:00, then there is side value around 9:00 thanks to line moves.) I had tracked it for ten days, it had a good record over that ten day span, so I figured I would share this info to give an idea as to how I am betting the NBA with Accuscore data. |
| Since I have printed out all the daily simulations in the NBA since opening day, I was able to go back and run the formula and check this out, but am continually coming up with a 50% winning record if I would have played all the games that fit this system. For 11/13 I have 5 games that fit this system right? Sea 9.5 Mia 1.0 Ind 6.5 NY 12 Por 5 Just making sure that I am doing this right and plugging in the right numbers. |
| It seems that the biggest edge is invariably the moneyline (same as in NFL lines); some of the ML edges are extraordinary, based on Accuscores simulations; tonight, 11/13, NYK gets 1000 with 25% chance of winning? That is a monstrous edge. We need to know if there is a history of accuracy with moneyline simulations. |
| Mathprof: Basically I take Accuscore's ATS underdog picks that have side value on the moneyline. I just calculate the moneylines first to see which has side value. The next step is taking only the ATS plays that Accuscore has covering more than 50%. Right now I only have winning data on ATS numbers. I'm researching ML bets for different spread ranges. |
| Archivist: I use the moneyline at whatever point I happen to be doing my research. Usually this is closer to the closing moneyline, since I often find myself doing this research at Chick-fil-a after I get off work at 6. I don't know what I'd do without their wifi access. Probably just go to Panera... |
| I am not clear on the following: "If you take picks that have an Accuscore side value..." are you refering to ML or ATS? or both? "and are covering the spread in Accuscore simulations..." covering the spread how often? 50% or more? or simply with side value even if 47% simulated cover, as an example? Finally, you've won at 65.5% rate? you must be betting ATS rather than moneyline (?) My initial impression was that this is a ML system. |
| < Prev | Next > |
|---|